UtilityBase logoUtilityBase

Text Tools

Grammar Checker

Grammar, spelling, and homophone checking with one-tap fixes — 25+ languages.

Updated July 10, 2026

How to use the grammar checker

  1. 1Paste your text — up to about 20,000 characters.
  2. 2Hit check; issues appear with highlighted context.
  3. 3Tap a suggestion to apply it; other issues re-anchor automatically.
  4. 4Accept what you understand; question style flags.

Common uses

  • Final pass on essays, emails, and applications
  • Homophone and typo catching before posting
  • Checking writing in a second language
  • A free second opinion without installing an extension

Frequently asked questions

What kinds of errors does it catch — and miss?

Reliably caught: spelling, homophone confusion (their/there/they're is its bread and butter), subject-verb agreement, double words, casing, many punctuation rules, and style flags like passive voice. Reliably missed: errors that produce grammatically valid sentences with the wrong meaning ('I told him I would meet her' when you meant 'him'), factual mistakes, and tone problems. Rule-based checkers verify rules, not intent — treat a clean result as 'no rule violations,' not 'good writing.'

Is my text private when I check it?

Not in the way most tools on this site are, and that deserves a straight answer: checking requires sending your text to LanguageTool's servers, where their privacy policy applies (they state texts aren't stored permanently for the free API, but the transmission is inherent to how it works). Practical rule: fine for essays, emails, posts, and anything you'd paste into a web translator; wrong for passwords, unreleased financials, privileged legal text, or anything whose exposure would genuinely matter.

Should I accept every suggestion?

No — and batch-accepting is how writing gets worse. Accept fixes you understand and recognize as errors (typos, agreement, homophones: high confidence territory). Question style suggestions: passive voice, sentence length, and word-choice flags are conventions, not laws, and deliberately breaking them is often the better sentence. When the checker flags something you wrote on purpose, you outrank it. The honest workflow: fix the reds fast, read the style suggestions as a second opinion from a very literal editor.

How does this compare to Grammarly?

Different engines and economics. This uses LanguageTool's rule-based open engine — thousands of hand-written grammar rules per language — which is excellent at concrete errors and free without an account. Grammarly layers ML models for tone, clarity rewrites, and flow, behind a subscription and a heavier privacy footprint (browser-wide extensions see everything you type). For catching real errors in a draft, the gap is smaller than the price difference suggests; for full-sentence rewriting, dedicated AI tools are a different category.

About this tool

The grammar checker runs your text through LanguageTool's open API — a mature rule-based engine that catches grammar errors, confused homophones (their/they're, weather/whether), agreement problems, and spelling in 25+ auto-detected languages — and presents each issue with its context highlighted and suggested fixes you can apply with one tap (remaining issues re-anchor automatically). This tool is the honest exception on a privacy-first site, and it says so plainly: your text is sent to LanguageTool's servers for analysis, so it's not the place for genuinely sensitive content. Free tier: ~20 checks/minute, ~20k characters each.

The grammar checker connects to an external service to fetch live data, so some of what you enter is sent over the network to provide the result — see the note in the tool for specifics. We don't require an account, and we don't store your queries. Most tools on UtilityBase run entirely in your browser; this one needs the network to do its job. Browse more text tools here.

Was this tool helpful?

Related tools